The KLEAN study of fosamprenavir-ritonavir versus lopinavir-ritonavir, each in combination with abacavir-lamivudine, for initial treatment of HIV infection over 48 …

J Eron, P Yeni, J Gathe, V Estrada, E DeJesus… - The Lancet, 2006 - thelancet.com
J Eron, P Yeni, J Gathe, V Estrada, E DeJesus, S Staszewski, P Lackey, C Katlama, B Young
The Lancet, 2006thelancet.com
Background Lopinavir-ritonavir is a preferred protease inhibitor co-formulation for initial HIV-
1 treatment. Fosamprenavir-ritonavir has shown similar efficacy and safety to lopinavir-
ritonavir when each is combined with two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. We
compared the two treatments directly in antiretroviral-naive patients. Methods This open-
label, non-inferiority study included 878 antiretroviral-naive, HIV-1-infected patients
randomised to receive either fosamprenavir-ritonavir 700 mg/100 mg twice daily or lopinavir …
Background
Lopinavir-ritonavir is a preferred protease inhibitor co-formulation for initial HIV-1 treatment. Fosamprenavir-ritonavir has shown similar efficacy and safety to lopinavir-ritonavir when each is combined with two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. We compared the two treatments directly in antiretroviral-naive patients.
Methods
This open-label, non-inferiority study included 878 antiretroviral-naive, HIV-1-infected patients randomised to receive either fosamprenavir-ritonavir 700 mg/100 mg twice daily or lopinavir-ritonavir 400 mg/100 mg twice daily, each with the co-formulation of abacavir-lamivudine 600 mg/300 mg once daily. Primary endpoints were proportion of patients achieving HIV-1 RNA less than 400 copies per mL at week 48 and treatment discontinuations because of an adverse event. The intent-to-treat analysis included all patients exposed to at least one dose of randomised study medication. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00085943.
Findings
At week 48, non-inferiority of fosamprenavir-ritonavir to lopinavir-ritonavir (95% CI around the treatment difference −4·84 to 7·05) was shown, with 315 of 434 (73%) patients in the fosamprenavir-ritonavir group and 317 of 444 (71%) in the lopinavir-ritonavir group achieving HIV-1 RNA less than 400 copies per mL. Treatment discontinuations due to an adverse event were few and occurred with similar frequency in the two treatment groups (fosamprenavir-ritonavir 53, 12%; lopinavir-ritonavir 43, 10%). Diarrhoea, nausea, and abacavir hypersensitivity were the most frequent drug-related grade 2–4 adverse events. Treatment-emergent drug resistance was rare; no patient had virus that developed reduced susceptibility to fosamprenavir-ritonavir or lopinavir-ritonavir.
Interpretation
Fosamprenavir-ritonavir twice daily in treatment-naive patients provides similar antiviral efficacy, safety, tolerability, and emergence of resistance as lopinavir-ritonavir, each in combination with abacavir-lamivudine.
thelancet.com